131 research outputs found

    Linearity Defects of Face Rings

    Get PDF
    Let S=K[x1,...,xn]S = K[x_1, ..., x_n ] be a polynomial ring over a field KK, and E=KE = K an exterior algebra. The "linearity defect" ldE(N)ld_E(N) of a finitely generated graded EE-module NN measures how far NN departs from "componentwise linear". It is known that ldE(N)<∞ld_E(N) < \infty for all NN. But the value can be arbitrary large, while the similar invariant ldS(M)ld_S(M) for an SS-module MM is alway at most nn. We show that if IΞ”I_\Delta (resp. JΞ”J_\Delta) is the squarefree monomial ideal of SS (resp. EE) corresponding to a simplicial complex Ξ”\Delta on 1,>...,n{1, >..., n}, then ldE(E/JΞ”)=ldS(S/IΞ”)ld_E(E/J_\Delta) = ld_S(S/I_\Delta). Moreover, except some extremal cases, ldld is a topological invariant of the Alexander dual Ξ”βˆ¨\Delta^\vee of Ξ”\Delta. We also show that, when n>3n > 3, ldE(E/JΞ”)=nβˆ’2ld_E(E/J_\Delta) = n-2 (this is the largest possible value) if and only if Ξ”\Delta is an nn-gon.Comment: 19pages. Section 5 is largely revised; particularly, the proof of Theorem 5.1 is simplified. To appear in J. Algebr

    Alexander duality and Stanley depth of multigraded modules

    Get PDF
    We apply Miller's theory on multigraded modules over a polynomial ring to the study of the Stanley depth of these modules. Several tools for Stanley's conjecture are developed, and a few partial answers are given. For example, we show that taking the Alexander duality twice (but with different "centers") is useful for this subject. Generalizing a result of Apel, we prove that Stanley's conjecture holds for the quotient by a cogeneric monomial ideal.Comment: 18 pages. We have removed Lemma 2.3 of the previous version, since the proof contained a gap. This deletion does not affect the main results, while we have revised argument a little (especially in Sections in 2 and 3

    Linearity Defects of Face Rings

    Get PDF

    Normal cyclic polytopes and cyclic polytopes that are not very ample

    Full text link
    Let dd and nn be positive integers with nβ‰₯d+1n \geq d + 1 and Ο„1,...,Ο„n\tau_{1}, ..., \tau_{n} integers with Ο„1<...<Ο„n\tau_{1} < ... < \tau_{n}. Let C_{d}(\tau_{1}, ..., \tau_{n}) \subset \RR^{d} denote the cyclic polytope of dimension dd with nn vertices (Ο„1,Ο„12,...,Ο„1d),...,(Ο„n,Ο„n2,...,Ο„nd)(\tau_{1},\tau_{1}^{2},...,\tau_{1}^{d}), ..., (\tau_{n},\tau_{n}^{2},...,\tau_{n}^{d}). We are interested in finding the smallest integer Ξ³d\gamma_{d} such that if Ο„i+1βˆ’Ο„iβ‰₯Ξ³d\tau_{i+1} - \tau_{i} \geq \gamma_{d} for 1≀i<n1 \leq i < n, then Cd(Ο„1,...,Ο„n)C_{d}(\tau_{1}, ..., \tau_{n}) is normal. One of the known results is Ξ³d≀d(d+1)\gamma_{d} \leq d (d + 1). In the present paper a new inequality Ξ³d≀d2βˆ’1\gamma_{d} \leq d^{2} - 1 is proved. Moreover, it is shown that if dβ‰₯4d \geq 4 with Ο„3βˆ’Ο„2=1\tau_{3} - \tau_{2} = 1, then Cd(Ο„1,...,Ο„n)C_{d}(\tau_{1}, ..., \tau_{n}) is not very ample.Comment: 17 page
    • …
    corecore